Ann Nenoff
October 7, 2015
Obama
and Putin: Friends, Enemies, Frenemies?
Awkward,
cringe worthy, forced, robotic, humorous. These descriptions and many others have
be used to describe the interaction between President Obama and Russian
President Vladimir Putin at the UN where they engaged in a reluctant-looking
handshake. The thirty-second encounter is surely based off their previous
dealings with each other, but may also give insight into how their relationship
will continue to develop. It is very apparent how different these two leaders
are from each other.
The two have always had
an interesting relationship, but it has never been a “good” one. That being
said, Obama needs to be tough on Putin. While Obama was confident about forging
a new partnership with Russia, and therefore Putin, at the beginning of his
presidency, that hope quickly faded. Since Putin reclaimed the presidency in
2012, their relationship has been rocky. It seemed to be a competition of who could
get in more sly digs and make a mockery of the other. Putin seems to enjoy
doing this, as is evidenced by the Op-Ed he had published in the New York Times.
Their relationship has gone through its ups and downs; the two have cooperated
on some issues, but really disagreed on others. Two of the most recent issues in
which Obama and Putin have been at odds are on Ukraine/Crimea and Syria.
In regards to Syria,
Putin has been overtly pushing the boundaries and testing the limits with his
actions. While the two may agree that the eradication of ISIS is necessary,
that is where their similar standing on the issue ends. Putin is a sympathizer
to the Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad, where Obama is not. They also
disagree on Syria’s use of chemical weapons and on who is considered a terrorist.
Russia makes no distinction between ISIS forces in Syria and the rebel forces
fighting against Assad. This has been problematic for Obama, and he has made
statements condemning the role that Russia is playing. Within the past week, Russia
has begun a bombing campaign in Syria, which puts Obama in even more of a
difficult position. Putin does something Obama does not like, and Obama says
how much he does not like it. That seems to be the pattern emerging.
However, being tough on
Putin does not mean forgoing diplomatic relationships. We need to make sure
that we continue having diplomatic relations with Russia because if those were
to get cut off, then the problem could drastically escalate, which could force
more U.S intervention. Fighting Russia’s military action with United States military
action is not the answer. Putin is cunning, manipulative, and a diabolical
planner. He has a plan to increase his strength in the Middle East, where he
can unite, strengthen, and empower anti-west sentiments. Acting more overtly in
Syria than he did in Ukraine, Putin pushes the boundaries, waits to see how
others react, and then seizes the moment when he realizes that he has the ability
and power to do so.
Recommending for
Obama to be tough towards Putin is a simple answer to a very complicated
question. Putin himself is a very complicated leader. There is value to
continuing diplomatic relations with Russia and not deploying other forms of
action to combat its wants. However, powerful rhetoric will not deter Putin
from acting the way he wants to. Putin has not been a man ready to compromise
with the West. Right now Obama and Putin are doing an awkward dance to see who
can push the other further. If concessions can be made that will benefit the
Syrian people and democratic ideals, then they should be made. If Putin will
continue to play games with the West and test its power, Obama should fire back
with political pressure. He doesn’t have another election to worry about, after
all. Russia is looking to exert dominance, and that is something we should keep
in check. There are many other issues and nations that warrant the United
States’ attention, but Russia is taking it all for itself. Putin is playing a
game and Obama needs to play it better than him.
No comments:
Post a Comment